Saturday, March 01, 2003
This makes me feel old
ParseMe.1st. SGML - a simplified superset of XML :-)
posted by Sean 6:43 AM
[Link]
. . .
Types, roles, groups etc. in access control. Is it a mess or am I missing something?
I've been playing around with some CMS/Portal systems lately and noodling the problem of providing fine grained access control. There seems to be a consensus of sorts around the core techniques (classifying logins, adding roles to them, putting them in groups etc.) However, my experience is that they are all implemented differently in different systems and the whole thing has an innate ability to become...well...ugly and complicated. Am I missing something?
posted by Sean 4:14 AM
[Link]
. . .
Hearye, hearye. Tim Bray has a blog.
Tim Bray. 'nuff said.
posted by Sean 3:09 AM
[Link]
. . .
Thursday, February 27, 2003
Scary vision of the future of XML from Kurt Cagle
Current message of the day on Cafe con Leche is a chilling vision of the future of 'XML'.
posted by Sean 6:31 AM
[Link]
. . .
Wednesday, February 26, 2003
Linux on the desktop 10% in India
Its in countries like India that desktop Linux will take off first. Linux seen grabbing 10% of desktop OS segment.
posted by Sean 7:07 AM
[Link]
. . .
Tuesday, February 25, 2003
The rise and rise of run-time design and configuration
Software = design + code + compile + deploy + run (in that order.). What an odd way to build systems! As more and more stuff is out there on the cloud and always on, I think we will need to explode this cosy time ordering. Some day, Run-time design and implementation will be the norm .
posted by Sean 2:10 AM
[Link]
. . .
Monday, February 24, 2003
Blogging goes mobile
Blogging goes mobile.
posted by Sean 3:10 AM
[Link]
. . .
Elliotte Rusty Harold' XML Infoset compliant Kangaroo
Warning: you need to be one of us XML geeks to find this funny :-)
posted by Sean 2:04 AM
[Link]
. . .
Sunday, February 23, 2003
Nice Python article on intelligententerprise.com
[via http://www.pythonware.com/daily] The Major Leagues.
posted by Sean 1:41 AM
[Link]
. . .
|
. . .
|